NANTUCKET, Mass. — For generations, the wreckage of an 1884 schooner lay buried beneath the sand along this Massachusetts island's south shore, known only to a handful of people who had stumbled across scattered fragments. Then a violent coastal storm rolled through over the weekend of Sept. 26, 2026, and the sea did the excavating.
After the Nor'easter battered Nantucket with heavy winds and high seas, island residents noticed wooden timbers jutting out of the sand at Point of Breakers, a south shore beach, arranged in the unmistakable shape of a ship's hull. The newly exposed structure sits in the same stretch of shoreline where fragments of a wreck were found in 2022 — a coincidence that has researchers cautiously optimistic about what the renewed exposure might reveal.
The discovery surfaced not through a formal survey but through a tip to a local newspaper. Jason Graziadei, editor-in-chief of the Nantucket Current, was covering the storm when he received a message from island resident David DeHart. "I found what I believe to be a shipwreck uncovered by the storm," DeHart wrote. Graziadei promptly drove out to the beach, bringing his son Owen along. "I drove out there with my son Owen and sure enough, it was right there where David said it was," he told NPR by email.
Photographs taken at the site show waves pounding the exposed remains, water washing over timbers that had been invisible for as long as anyone could remember. The images offer the clearest view yet of how much of the vessel is preserved, and they underline the central mystery: not whether there is a wreck, but whose wreck it is.
That question was first addressed three years ago. In 2022, David Robinson, director and chief archeologist for the Massachusetts Board of Underwater Archeological Resources, inspected the earlier finds. He then spent several months conducting research alongside the Egan Maritime Institute and the Nantucket Historical Association, drawing on archival records, historic photographs, site visits and the physical evidence itself.
Robinson's conclusion was careful rather than absolute: the remnants likely belonged to a schooner called the Warren Sawyer. Speaking to the Current in 2023, he framed the effort as an attempt to weigh everything the team had assembled. As with most historical archaeological research, he explained, the work involves exploring the available literature and the archival, photographic and archaeological evidence collected for a site in order to try to reach a conclusive determination about whether the wreckage is from the Warren Sawyer. That caution is standard practice in underwater archaeology, where a partial match of timbers, fasteners or cargo can be compelling without being definitive.
The candidate vessel is a documented one. The Warren Sawyer was a cargo ship that ran from New Orleans to Boston carrying bales of cotton and scrap iron, and it went ashore during the night of Dec. 22, 1884, more than 140 years before this week's storm. A working schooner of that era would have been built largely of wood, and the hull-shaped arrangement of exposed timbers at Point of Breakers is consistent with the remains of a wooden sailing vessel that has been buried, scoured and reburied by successive seasons of surf and sand.
Storms like the one that uncovered the remains are not unusual for Nantucket. The island sits squarely in the path of Nor'easters — powerful, slow-moving coastal storms that strike from the northeast and combine hurricane-force winds with dangerously high tides. Between 1884 and now, generations of researchers and residents have walked Point of Breakers without necessarily noticing anything more than driftwood and scattered fastenings. A single weekend of extraordinary wave action changed that.
For islanders, the reappearance of the timbers is both a scientific opportunity and a moment of local reckoning. Nantucket's maritime history is a point of civic pride, and the island's economy and identity remain tied to the water. Any further work on the site would fall under the framework of state regulation: historic shipwrecks in state waters are typically protected, and underwater archaeological investigation is generally carried out under permit with an eye toward documenting and preserving a site in place rather than removing it.
The new exposure also raises the question of timing. Exposed wooden remains are not durable artifacts. Timber that has survived more than a century buried in sand can degrade quickly once it is dried out, scoured by surf and exposed to salt, air and foot traffic. Researchers who study such sites typically work fast for that reason, and the collaboration that formed around the 2022 finds — combining state expertise with two of the island's own historical institutions — suggests an established process ready to respond to a larger exposure.
The discovery also illustrates how informal observation can start a chain of serious historical inquiry. DeHart was not looking for a shipwreck; he was a resident walking the shoreline after a storm. But his observation reached a local newsroom, which had the resources to confirm it and the standing relationship with island historians to get the news in front of the people who could interpret it. Graziadei, Robinson, the Egan Maritime Institute and the Nantucket Historical Association are now part of a single chain of custody for a piece of history that was essentially lost.
Robinson's original assessment, offered three years ago, framed the identification as an open question rather than a settled answer. The storm of Sept. 26, 2026, did not answer it. What it did was put more of the vessel back on the sand — converting an argument about scattered fragments into a visible hull that anyone walking Point of Breakers can now see, and that researchers may soon be able to study in far greater detail.
(0)